Smarteeva vs Competitors

How Smarteeva Compares to QMS Platforms for Post-Market Surveillance

Smarteeva is a post-market surveillance platform built natively on Salesforce for medical device manufacturers. Most alternatives are quality management systems that add post-market surveillance as a module. The difference shows up in complaint intake, IMDRF coding, reportability decisions, and regulatory submissions, where Smarteeva runs the full chain on one data model instead of connecting separate tools.

What separates a post-market surveillance platform from a QMS

Quality management systems were built to control documents, training records, and change processes. Post-market surveillance was added to them later, usually as a module that stores complaint records and routes approvals.

That works until the regulatory work starts. A complaint has to be coded, assessed for reportability against the rules of every market you sell in, and turned into a submission on a deadline. Those steps need a data model that understands device codes, event types, and reporting timelines.

Smarteeva starts there. Complaints, adverse events, risk assessments, and recalls share one data model, so a change in one updates the others without an export or a handoff.

Capability

Built for
Complaint intake
IMDRF coding
Reportability
MDR submission
Periodic reports
Risk management
Recall management
AI audit trail

QMS/Manual Process

Document control and quality processes
Forms and routing, extraction is manual
Manual or third-party lookup
Procedural, run by the quality team
Export, then file separately
Assembled by hand from exports
Separate module or separate system
Rarely included
Varies by vendor
OUTCOMES

What the numbers look like

35%
of FDA MDRs. One Platform.
In the first 6 months: 95% reduction in duplicates from bulk imports.
70%
Faster complaint resolution
Median closure improved from 45–60 days to approximately 15 days
100%
Customer retention
4 in 5 customers expand beyond their first module. Average tenure: 4+ years.
PMS Vendor

Questions to ask any post-market surveillance vendor

Ask your vendor

Where does the complaint record end and the reportability assessment begin?
How is IMDRF coding handled?
Can you generate the submission, or only store the data?
Where does risk management live?
Can you show me the AI audit log?
What runs alongside this?

Weak Answer

They are separate systems and we sync them
Free text fields, or a lookup your team maintains
We store it, your team files it
Separate module, updated at periodic review
It is on the roadmap
New stack, new permissions, new integrations

Questions?

We’re glad you asked.

Can a QMS handle post-market surveillance?

A QMS can store complaint records and route approvals. The gap appears at coding, reportability assessment, and submission generation, which most QMS platforms leave to the quality team or a separate tool.

Is Smarteeva a QMS?

No. Smarteeva is a post-market surveillance platform. It covers complaints, adverse events, reportability, submissions, risk management, and recalls, and it works alongside a document control system rather than replacing one.

Does Smarteeva require Salesforce?

Yes. Smarteeva is 100% Salesforce native, which means it inherits Salesforce security, permissions, and integrations rather than running a separate stack.

Can Smarteeva work alongside our existing QMS?

Yes. Smarteeva covers the post-market surveillance chain and integrates with the systems already handling document control and training.

How does Smarteeva handle IMDRF coding?

Coding happens inside the complaint record using IMDRF Annex A and Annex E terminology, so the codes that drive reportability stay attached to the record.

What is the difference between complaint management and post-market surveillance?

Complaint management handles individual complaints from intake to closure. Post-market surveillance is the wider obligation that includes trending across complaints, signal detection, periodic reporting, and feeding findings back into risk management.